lavinmq.com
We loaded 5 of your pages the way a customer does - on a typical phone, on a normal cellular connection - and checked what decides whether visitors stay, can use the page, and get recommended by AI.
A snapshot of the live site on June 30, 2026. If the site has changed since, this may no longer reflect it.
The main gap is accessibility: 15 issues across 5 pages make controls and images hard to use for screen reader users, while mobile speed is fair and the site already reads well for AI tools and search engines.
Visitors typically wait about 3 seconds for the main content to appear, with the homepage, the docs getting started page, and the blog index loading slowest. No pages cause a long stall or visible jumping.
- → Homepage (biggest piece at 3.9s)
- → Docs: Getting Started (laggy to tap)
A bit slower than the under-2.5-second mark that feels instant on a phone.
▶ Press play - this is the 3.9s a phone visitor waits, in real time.
For a stretch while it loads, taps and scrolls lag behind the finger.
▶ Press play - watch it stutter while it tries to load.
A bit slower than the under-2.5-second mark that feels instant on a phone.
▶ Press play - this is the 3.3s a phone visitor waits, in real time.
A bit slower than the under-2.5-second mark that feels instant on a phone.
▶ Press play - this is the 3.2s a phone visitor waits, in real time.
A bit slower than the under-2.5-second mark that feels instant on a phone.
▶ Press play - this is the 2.6s a phone visitor waits, in real time.
Screen reader users hit 15 problems across 5 pages, including controls a screen reader cannot read and images with no description, worst on the homepage. Keyboard-only users may also struggle to use these controls. This risks lost customers, some legal risk, and weaker search visibility.
Start with your worst-affected page (Homepage): label its controls clearly so screen reader visitors know what they do. The other 4 pages have their own barriers; see the cards below.
On the homepage, 14 images have no description for screen reader users, some sections use special accessibility roles that aren't structured correctly, and several areas of text are hard to read due to low contrast.
- →Fix the structure of sections using special accessibility roles to match what assistive tech expects
- →Add descriptions (alt text) to the images that are missing one
- →Darken light-colored text so it is easier to read
Several images on this page have no description for screen reader users, a dropdown menu has no readable label so people don't know what it controls, and some links can only be told apart by color.
- →Add descriptions (alt text) to the images that are missing one
- →Add a label to the dropdown menu so people know what it controls
- →Make the color-only links distinguishable some other way, like underline
Many links on this page have no readable text, so screen reader and keyboard users can't tell where they lead, and a large amount of text is too low-contrast to read easily; one image also has no description.
- →Add a description (alt text) to the image that is missing one
- →Darken or adjust text colors across the page so they are easier to read
- →Add descriptive text to the links that currently have none
Some interactive controls use accessibility markup that doesn't follow expected rules, which can confuse screen reader users, and several text and button colors are too light to read comfortably.
- →Fix the invalid accessibility markup used on some interactive controls
- →Correct elements with special accessibility roles so they contain the right content
- →Darken light-colored text and buttons so they are easier to read
One image on this article has no description, so screen reader users can't tell what it shows, and several areas of text have colors that are hard to read for people with low vision.
- →Add a description (alt text) to the image that is missing one
- →Darken light text so it is easier to read
- →Fix the heading order so sections nest in a logical sequence
AI tools and search engines can already read 93% of the site's content directly, and the overall score is 96 out of 100. This is a strong foundation to keep as the site grows.
Nearly all of each page's content is already in the HTML and cleanly marked up, so AI assistants read these fine.
The single fix behind most of this is making sure your full page content is present the moment the page loads - done well, it speeds the page up for real visitors and makes you readable to AI at the same time. That is the work we do every day at ShakaCode; happy to walk through what we found.
Measured June 30, 2026 on an emulated mid-range phone over the Slow-4G profile Google PageSpeed uses - the conditions a real mobile visitor faces, not a developer's laptop. Speed score is Google's 0-100 mobile scale (90+ is fast, under 50 is slow); layout shift is Google's CLS (above 0.25 is poor); accessibility score is the Google Lighthouse 0-100 scale. Put together by ShakaCode.